Saturday 27 December 2014

Why Are Most Startups Not Able To Raise Series-A Funding?





Most startups, even those who get angel funding or seed-stage funding or investments from accelerators/incubators, are unable to get follow-on funding. Why is Series-A funding so elusive? When Angel Investors invest in a startup, they do so after assessing whether the startup will be able to raise follow-on capital. That's how they have a chance of getting an exit for their investments. Why then, are startups not able to raise follow-on capital despite the mentoring and advice they receive from their angel investors or accelerators or incubators? At GHV Accelerator, we analyzed this problem and spoke to investors and startups to understand the reasons. And based on our conversations, we had some very interesting observations. Kindly note that these are reasons of decline by VC's, even when they believed that the opportunity was large and the concept/product was exciting. Reasons for startups to not get Series-A funding (This is in no order or priority, but investors mentioned

                  That they often see at least two of these reasons in angel-funded or accelerator-supported startups that they end up declining) When we spoke to startups, we realized that most were totally unprepared to engage with VCs. Here is a checklist of what we think startups should be prepared with. Of course, there are a whole lot more things that they need to be ready with, but these are absolutely necessary for even getting follow-up meetings after the initial interaction with VCs - research their past investments, understand their perspectives and thoughts on the market, etc. This helps startups align their thoughts and conversations in line with the VC perspective. Given that finding Series-A funding is such a challenge, we at GHV Accelerator, had organized webinar. Check the webinar details on - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy8W75wqAzw . About the Author : Vikram Upadhyaya, Accelerator Evangelist, GHV Accelerator Vikram is having diversified experience from Japanese Projects Offshoring to Global Corporate Strategy and New Ventures Turnaround, specialized for the Japan-India Cross Border Business execution. READ MORE

Thursday 18 December 2014

Webinar on Legal Aspects While Raising Series A

Webinar at 3:00pm-4:00pm, on Friday, 19th December 2014

Are you a startup gearing up for Series A funding? Have you completed all your legal 
paperwork and formalities? Arm yourself with the knowledge of the entire legal deal and 
ensure a smooth sailing for your startup.

Click here to Register

Join us for insights and perspectives from Payal Chawla and Anurag Kapoor   

anurag sir
Anurag Kapoor
Excutive Director
GHV Accelerator

Anurag is the Ex-cofounder and MD of MEGStrat Consulting.
With over 10 years of experience, some of his key expertise areas include business plan development and appraisal, brand promotion and marketing, investment research, business research, market research, strategy formulation, goal setting and leadership development.

Payal Chawla
Partner
Justcontractus

Payal has had the opportunity of working on some exciting projects including foreign direct investment; acquisitions of listed/unlisted companies; marketing arrangement for a new product in the wireless mobile telephony space; real estate acquisitions; advising overseas entities on anti-trust and competition laws; sale of developments rights on land etc.

Tuesday 16 December 2014

What is Proof of Concept or POC?


Proof of Concept or POC, as the name indicates, is a test that provides evidence that the hypothesis on that concept has been proven. In business context, especially startups, POC could be a - hypothesis around a technology innovation, service, value proposition, price-point, business model or anything that needs to be proven or demonstrated.
For example, if you are building a software or hardware product, a POC could be done to demonstrate that the product works and performs the tasks that it is intended to do. In addition, when doing a POC, you will also have to check on things like ease of use by the user, bottlenecks and things that need to be improved in the product.
However, testing a product is just one component of the POC process for startups because you have not started a venture to just create a product. Your venture is about monetising the product – either by selling to someone who will pay for it, or by building a community/user base so that others (e.g. advertisers) will pay for using the product/service, or any other model in which the product or service can be monetised.
Testing your business idea
I often see startups declare that they have had a successful POC because they have developed a product that works. But one has to go beyond that. You have to test whether the business aspects around the product work as well.
For example, are you able to produce the product or deliver the service at a cost that will make it financially viable to launch? Are your intended customers seeing the value of the product or service, and most importantly, are they willing to pay the price that you estimate they would pay?
In other words, a Proof of Concept is about testing the commercial feasibility of a concept – whether it is a technology innovation, a product or a service.
POC vs. Prototype
Often startups get confused between a prototype and a POC. A prototype is just one component of a POC. POC is a broader term in which a prototype is just one aspect to be tested.
prototype, or a MVP, is a rough/early or a version of the product that is not mass-produced, but produced as a single unit or in very small quantity to check if the product works as intended.
Why is POC important?
POC is important because without establishing that there is a reasonable chance of building a profitable business around the innovation or idea, there is no point in starting the business.
An innovative idea enamors many entrepreneurs, and they rush to convert that idea into a venture. But a startup is about building a business. How well you plan different aspects about your business is going to be as critical as the innovation or product or service or idea. And POC helps you test the financial viability and other aspects of the business for that innovation.

The writer of this article is Vikram Upadhyaya. He is the Chief Mentor and Accelerator Evangelist at GHV Accelerator. He is also the Co-Founder of the Indian Angel Network Incubator and an advisor to projects being undertaken through the Telecom Centres of Excellence (TCOE). - See more at: http://www.entrepreneurindia.com/article/features/columnists/What-is-Proof-of-Concept-or-POC-554/#sthash.9xsyo75x.dpuf

- See more at: http://www.entrepreneurindia.com/article/features/columnists/What-is-Proof-of-Concept-or-POC-554/#sthash.9xsyo75x.dpuf

What is Proof of Concept or POC? (ENTREPRENEUR INDIA)

Proof of Concept or POC, as the name indicates, is a test that provides evidence that the hypothesis on that concept has been proven. In business context, especially startups, POC could be a - hypothesis around a technology innovation, service, value proposition, price-point, business model or anything that needs to be proven or demonstrated.
For example, if you are building a software or hardware product, a POC could be done to demonstrate that the product works and performs the tasks that it is intended to do. In addition, when doing a POC, you will also have to check on things like ease of use by the user, bottlenecks and things that need to be improved in the product.
However, testing a product is just one component of the POC process for startups because you have not started a venture to just create a product. Your venture is about monetising the product – either by selling to someone who will pay for it, or by building a community/user base so that others (e.g. advertisers) will pay for using the product/service, or any other model in which the product or service can be monetised.

Testing your business idea
I often see startups declare that they have had a successful POC because they have developed a product that works. But one has to go beyond that. You have to test whether the business aspects around the product work as well.
For example, are you able to produce the product or deliver the service at a cost that will make it financially viable to launch? Are your intended customers seeing the value of the product or service, and most importantly, are they willing to pay the price that you estimate they would pay?
In other words, a Proof of Concept is about testing the commercial feasibility of a concept – whether it is a technology innovation, a product or a service.

POC vs. Prototype
Often startups get confused between a prototype and a POC. A prototype is just one component of a POC. POC is a broader term in which a prototype is just one aspect to be tested.
prototype, or a MVP, is a rough/early or a version of the product that is not mass-produced, but produced as a single unit or in very small quantity to check if the product works as intended.

Why is POC important?
POC is important because without establishing that there is a reasonable chance of building a profitable business around the innovation or idea, there is no point in starting the business.
An innovative idea enamors many entrepreneurs, and they rush to convert that idea into a venture. But a startup is about building a business. How well you plan different aspects about your business is going to be as critical as the innovation or product or service or idea. And POC helps you test the financial viability and other aspects of the business for that innovation.

For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : EntrepreneurIndia. 

Webinar on Unable Failed to get Series A funding



Are you a startup gearing up for Series A funding? Or are you a startup that tried and failed? Either way, hear the experts share their views on what could go or could have gone wrong.
Watch this for insights and perspectives from Vikram Upadhyaya and Deepak Srinath – Mentors who have helped startups reach and close Series A, and beyond

Green House Ventures Accelerator ties up with LetsVenture

Green House Ventures Accelerator ties up with LetsVenture

Gurgaon-based Green House Ventures (GHV) Accelerator has joined hands with deal discovery platform LetsVenture(LV) in a collaborative model to create easier access to capital for seed ventures.
"LetsVenture has access to good quality startups. With this partnership we will get access to good curated startups, and it reduces our time frame for evaluation since one level of curation will be done," said Anurag Kapoor, executive director and co-founder, GHV.
For startups listed on LetsVenture, this partnership gives them access to high value mentoring and increases chances of funding.
Vikram Upadhyaya, Chief Mentor at GHV, said: "We are going to look at all the startups in LetsVenture, who have the potential to grow 10x."
Founded in 2013, LetsVenture is an online platform that connects startups with investors to facilitate early stage funding and currently has over 2,200 startups and 760 investors from 19 countries registered on it.
GHV's selection criteria for startups will focus on - team, execution, capability, scalability, technology, and proof of concept.
"The idea is to partner with a lot of players in the ecosystem who can help these startups go to the next level. We're also helping GHV curate some of these startup companies," said Shanti Mohan, founder and CEO, LetsVenture. Once they have completed the acceleration program, GHV will bring them back to the platform for early funding.
GHV's program houses 10 startups at a time through a one-year long program. Each startup can get seed funded with up to $100,000 in exchange for equity to the tune of 20% at a maximum.
"We will only see actual results in a year, to know how effective the partnership actually is," said Mohan.

Friday 12 December 2014

Green House Ventures Accelerator ties up with LetsVenture (Economic Times)

Gurgaon-based Green House Ventures (GHV) Accelerator has joined hands with deal discovery platform LetsVenture(LV) in a collaborative model to create easier access to capital for seed ventures.
"LetsVenture has access to good quality startups. With this partnership we will get access to good curated startups, and it reduces our time frame for evaluation since one level of curation will be done," said Anurag Kapoor, executive director and co-founder, GHV.

For startups listed on LetsVenture, this partnership gives them access to high value mentoring and increases chances of funding.
Vikram Upadhyaya, Chief Mentor at GHV, said: "We are going to look at all the startups in LetsVenture, who have the potential to grow 10x."
Founded in 2013, LetsVenture is an online platform that connects startups with investors to facilitate early stage funding and currently has over 2,200 startups and 760 investors from 19 countries registered on it.
GHV's selection criteria for startups will focus on - team, execution, capability, scalability, technology, and proof of concept.
"The idea is to partner with a lot of players in the ecosystem who can help these startups go to the next level. We're also helping GHV curate some of these startup companies," said Shanti Mohan, founder and CEO, LetsVenture. Once they have completed the acceleration program, GHV will bring them back to the platform for early funding.
GHV's program houses 10 startups at a time through a one-year long program. Each startup can get seed funded with up to $100,000 in exchange for equity to the tune of 20% at a maximum.
"We will only see actual results in a year, to know how effective the partnership actually is," said Mohan.Shonali.

For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : Economic Times. 

Tuesday 9 December 2014

How to raise funding for a prototype? (ENTREPRENEUR INDIA)

In the context of a startup, a prototype should be anything that will help you to demonstrate that not just the product, but also whether the intended users of the product are actually as excited about the product as you are. A prototype is something that allows you to test the various assumptions that you have made for your venture.
A prototype has to be a very basic version of your product – just enough to give your consumers a feel of what you are building or something that will demonstrate that your technology or innovation actually works.
Most aspiring entrepreneurs with ideas often tend to seek angel investors or venture capitalists (VCs), to fund them at prototype development stage. That is, however, unlikely to happen in most cases. Investors investing at a power-point or pre-prototype stage are very rare.

How then should aspiring entrepreneurs deal with the funding needs for even building the prototype? Here are some thoughts:

Keep the costs at bare minimum.
Often entrepreneurs who are at the prototype stage make the mistake of taking on costs like office space, capex like hardware, etc. While a comfortable office is good to have, but at the prototype stage it makes sense to optimise and focus costs only on the key objective – i.e. building a damn good product.
Also, at the prototype stage, it is not necessary to build all the features and certainly not the frills that make the product look good. A functional prototype that helps the intended audiences experience the product and get a feel for the use-case is sufficient.
Take on only those costs that help you deliver on the sole objective of proving that the technology/innovation works and/or that consumer find it useful.

As best as possible, try to bootstrap and make the prototype with your own resources.
Try to build the prototype on your own rather than outsourcing it to an external agency. Angel investors or VCs are unlikely to provide funds for building a prototype. At the very least, they will expect you to go into the market, talk to a reasonable number of customers/users and get the evidence that what you are building is indeed going to be liked by the market. And in most cases, you are likely to need a prototype to get that evidence.
In most cases, I have observed that the costs of building a prototype is really a lot lower than what the entrepreneurs estimate. Often, you will be able to convince a vendor or partner to provide their service/components pro bono or low bono, perhaps with the commitment that you will give them either a higher value after you raise capital or giving them nominal equity in lieu of their services.

Despite keeping costs to a minimum, if you need to raise some capital, try to take help from friends & family.

Family & friends are indeed a relatively easier pool to tap into. There are several examples of entrepreneurs raising their initial capital – very limited fund raise – with small co-investments by a number of people including ex-bosses, ex-colleagues, ex-business associates/partners, family members, relatives, friends, etc.
Bring money from friends and family who trust you and are giving you money for your entrepreneurial journey with mid and long-term returns.
The trick is to manage this round with the level of rigour, maturity, discipline and governance standards as you would do with an institutional investor. Do the documentation well, explain the risks and potential rewards well, help them understand the terms, set clear and easy to understand term-sheets, have a good share holder agreement, etc.
Many entrepreneurs feel shy of asking family & friends. However, it is not as if you are asking them to donate for a cause. You are giving them an investment opportunity in which you are staking your opportunity cost because you believe that the concept will have a good monetary upside.

If family & friends does not work for you, instead of approaching angel investor groups or VCs, try approaching individual investors who may have an interest in your space.

After you explore your first circle of family & friends, instead of angel investors or VCs, it is prudent to explore individuals who may have an interest in your space.

You may also have an opportunity to get some funding from corporates who may have a strategic interest in the product or service you are attempting to make.

For Example - If you are building a healthcare app, someone who owns a pharma company or a hospital may be interested in investing in the venture. Or, if you are building a logistics startup, someone in the retail or logistics space may be interested in the concept.

Put in your own savings
Nothing demonstrates your commitment and belief in the venture than you putting your savings into the game.

In any case, do not raise too much money for a prototype.

Focus on building a good, basic product. Keep it simple. Keep it low-cost.

For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : EntrepreneurIndia

Wednesday 26 November 2014

Why are most startups not able to raise Series-A funding?

Most startups, even those who get angel funding or seed-stage funding or investments from accelerators/incubators, are unable to get follow-on funding. Why is Series-A funding so elusive? When Angel Investors invest in a startup, they do so after assessing whether the startup will be able to raise follow-on capital. That’s how they have a chance of getting an exit for their investments.
Why then, are startups not able to raise follow-on capital despite the mentoring and advice they receive from their angel investors or accelerators or incubators? At GHV Accelerator, we analyzed this problem and spoke to investors and startups to understand the reasons. And based on our conversations, we had some very interesting observations. Kindly note that these are reasons of decline by VC’s, even when they believed that the opportunity was large and the concept/product was exciting.
Reasons for startups to not get Series-A funding
(This is in no order or priority, but investors mentioned that they often see at least two of these reasons in angel-funded or accelerator-supported startups that they end up declining)
  • The team has failed to build the skill-sets and competencies that are required to take the venture to the next level i.e. some skill sets are missing
  •  The venture has not done enough to demonstrate that there is a potential to grow i.e. whilst focusing on developing the product, the venture missed out on building traction as an evidence of the potential
  • Lack of defensibility of the differentiator – often lack of IP or anything that can give the company a defensible, unfair advantage
  • Lack of in-market validation of the product
  • Interestingly, poor product or service was rarely a reason for decline
When we spoke to startups, we realized that most were totally unprepared to engage with VCs. Here is a checklist of what we think startups should be prepared with. Of course, there are a whole lot more things that they need to be ready with, but these are absolutely necessary for even getting follow-up meetings after the initial interaction with VCs – research their past investments, understand their perspectives and thoughts on the market, etc. This helps startups align their thoughts and conversations in line with the VC perspective.
  • Understand their investment criteria – some may give more weightage to traction, some to the team, some to market sentiments, some to global opportunities while some may look for domestic focus, etc.
  • Understand what they are looking for i.e. the kind of ventures they are seeking – some may be keen on product ventures while some may be open to a services business. Some may look at operationally intensive businesses, while some may not.
  • What is the investment scenario – remember startups are ‘competing for capital’ with other startups, even those from completely different sectors than yours – and therefore, it is important to understand the investors view of your sector. (e.g. in the current environment, some VCs are shunning e-commerce ventures while some believe that there is still some potential in verticle spaces, and yet some others are keen to invest in ventures that support e-commerce e.g. logistics, analytics, etc.)
  • Be clear on what you seek from the VCs beyond the money – clearly articulate how they may be able to add value – this helps them understand why this could be a relevant investment for them e.g. “You have investments in XYZ and ABC company. Clearly, there are synergies in what we do and two of your portfolio companies. Hence, we believe that your fund will be the ideal investor for us as it will help us leverage some synergies.”
Check the webinar –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy8W75wqAzw
About the Author :
Vikram Upadhyaya, Accelerator Evangelist, GHV Accelerator
Vikram is having diversified experience from Japanese Projects Offshoring to Global Corporate Strategy and New Ventures Turnaround, specialized for the Japan-India Cross Border Business execution.
For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/

Source : YOUR STORY 

Wednesday 19 November 2014

Team, the most important ingredient in a start-up (ENTREPRENEUR INDIA)

Ask any investor or successful entrepreneur, and they will reiterate that the most important factor in a start-up is the quality of its founding team. A team is more important than the idea or the size of the market or the technology or the business case, or indeed any other factor that investors will review to check the investment-worthiness of a venture.

Even if  - the product is great; the technology is cutting-edge; the market is large and the company has a strong chance to be a dominant player in that large market - investors will hesitate to invest in the venture if they do not get the confidence that the founding team can deliver in the market.

What investors seek is a team that is passionate about the subject, is enthusiastic about the opportunity, has a good grasp on the dynamics of ‘business’ and not just the product/service, and who can demonstrate commitment to fight it out in the market.

While it is good to have experience in the domain, that is not a must, as that will exclude a number of bright people who either do not have work experience or are from a different domain than the concept they are pursuing. However, what is important is that even without experience in the sector, the team should have studied the sector enough to understand it very well. In fact, that is also why passion and interest in the sector is critical, because that makes it easier for a person to study the sector well.

An ideal team is one in which core functions required to execute the concept in the market are well covered – ideally – one techie, one ops person and one hustler for sales. However, the dynamics of each market differ and the team ideally should be relevant for that market. E.g. the sales person’s profile and competence for a big-ticket enterprise product (e.g. analytics) selling to large, global companies will be very different than the competence required for selling small-ticket products/service (e.g. SAAS platform) to 1,000s of smaller companies.

The founding team should have leadership skills. There is a war for talent in the market. And hence, unless the founders exude confidence and have great leadership and people management skills, it will be difficult for them to attract and retain talent.

Most importantly, the team should have the willingness to roll up their sleeves and implement on the ground. As you would have heard from many entrepreneurs and investors, ideas are a dime a dozen. It is the quality of execution that matters.

Last, but not the least, it is important for the founding team to have decided who will be the CEO from among them. That decision is critical for investors, as they do not want the founders to fight over this at a later stage after they have invested. 

At GHV Accelerator, we use the filter of T.E.S.T. POC – which stands for Team – Execution Capabilities – Scalability – Technology and Proof of Concept. While each of these are important, if the first T - i.e. Team - is not the right one, scoring high on the rest of the parameters is not important.

For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : EntrepreneurIndia

Monday 27 October 2014

Green House Ventures Accelerator partners with Japanese VC fund World Innovation Lab (Economic Times)

Delhi-based Green House Ventures (GHV) Accelerator, which launched operations earlier this month, has inked a partnership with (WiL), a Japan-based venture capital fund that invests in disruptive startups with global appeal. WiL helps startups bridge the gap between their home markets and US markets and this partnership marks its entry into the Indian startup ecosystem.

WiL is founded by serial technology and internet entrepreneur Gen Isayama and ex-chief incubation officer of Yahoo, Masataka Matsumoto, who will both come on board as mentors to startups housed at GHV, committing five days a month of their time together. "India today looks like what China was 10 years back and growth here will be much stronger in the next few years. We would like to fund a couple of companies from GHV if there is a strong connection to Silicon Valley or Japan. If we see benefits of cross-border mentorship and regular dialogue, the next step will be to set up a fund or facility which we can jointly run to continue our relationship," said Isayama, co-founder and CEO, WiL.
Additionally, through this partnership, WiL will be supporting growth and expansion of GHV startups in global markets, targeting Japan and the US, to help them increasing client reach, visibility and building a strong product. Post-acceleration, WiL will look closely at GHV startups to fund them as Series A investors. WiL typically invests $5-30 million in early as well as growth-stage technology and internet startups through multiple rounds of investments and will follow the same investment thesis for GHV startups.
It, however, doesn't have a pre-defined corpus set aside for GHV startups nor will it take a stake or a board seat in any startup during the programme at this point. Also, WiL will bring in their network of companies in the US and Japan to help these companies expand globally.
Alongside, it will work as on-the-ground partners with GHV for demo day, when startups pitch to investors, which will be held in Japan and Singapore. "The partnership brings an entire ecosystem in place, mentoring support, global expertise and a Series A funding opportunity for our startups. I see these three things as strong value of the partnership," said Vikram Upadhyaya, chief mentor at GHV.
"Our partnership is strategic in nature and vision is to develop a long-term engagement. If successful, we would like to take it global," said Anurag Kapoor, executive director and co-founder, GHV.
For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : Economic Times. 

Wednesday 15 October 2014

Angel Investor Vikram Upadhyaya Launches Green House Ventures (GHV) Accelerator (Economic Times)

Entrepreneur and angel investor Vikram Upadhyaya has launched Green House Ventures Accelerator (GHV), which will fund and mentor startups between the incubation and venture capital stages.
"GHV will house startups at pre-venture capital stage but post incubation," said Upadhyaya, chief mentor at GHV who has invested in companies like Druva, Stayzilla, Merinews, IndiaCollegesearch. "They should have gone through an incubator or passed the criteria of an incubation stage, proof of concept, paying customers, revenues, team in place, and validation of the business model." Unlike others in India, GHV does not work on a batch system. Instead, the sector agnostic accelerator will house 10 startups at a time through a yearlong programme. Each startup will get seed funding up to $ 100,000 in exchange for equity up to 20 per cent.
According to Upadhyaya, the accelerator has received interest from 350 startups, of which 10 will be short-listed over the next 10 months. Entrepreneurs are required to be resident at GHV once a month for a week to get mentored. "We took a flexible approach because these companies already have teams in existing locations. Moving them may be difficult," Upadhyaya said. Alongside, startups will work in a controlledenvironment where specific functions like human resource (HR), finance, market research will be provided by a set of predefined vendors identified by GHV.
"Instead of spending time on all this, umbrella services provided will act as a de-facto department for these companies and is optional to startups," Upadhyaya said. Anurag Kapoor, executive director and co-founder of GHV, will head this side of operations. The intention is to help companies ramp up growth, focus on scale, shorten time to get VC funded, and attract higher valuation. So far, GHV has a commitment from four small and midsized domain experts to act as vendors in the space of market research, finance, HR, and public relations. "This program is going to prepare startups to close Series A in 12 months. Some VCs, which are also mentors at GHV, have shown interest to co-invest with funds in Japan," he said. 
For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : Economic Times. 

Wednesday 9 July 2014

Govt ropes in advisor for stuck telecom projects (The Hindu Business Line)

The Government has roped in Vikram Upadhyaya, Co-Founder of the Indian Angel Network Incubator, as an advisor to projects being undertaken through the Telecom Centres of Excellence (TCOE). The primary objective of roping in Upadhyaya is to ensure that the ideas generated by TCOEs are taken from conception to commercial deployment based on sound business.
The Government had set up TCOEs in a first-of-its-kind public-private partnership in the telecom sector. There are eight Telecom Centres of Excellence across the country working on key issues like technology management, rural application, next-generation network and policy. However, after more than five years of existence, the applications have not been deployed commercially.
“I have submitted a broad framework on how to turn around the TCOEs. I have seen some very good ideas being worked on at these centres. Over the next 12 to 18 months my focus will be on taking some of these ideas to the market,” Upadhyaya told BusinessLine, adding that he has also proposed collaboration between the TCOEs and the Indian Angel Network Incubator.
Upadhyaya has been an angel investor and has orchestrated multimillion-dollar business start-ups, turnarounds and growth ventures. Having worked in Japan in the late 1990s, Upadhyaya is known for his familiarity with the country and will try to interest Japanese in TCOE. Upadhayaya sees his unpaid advisory role as a business opportunity.
Separately, he is planning to start a seed accelerator fund in India with the backing of investors from Silicon Valley. Accelerators help new start-ups companies get off the ground and find follow-on investors through mentorship and a network of potential financiers. Upadhyaya said that India needs an accelerator that brings down the time period for a start-up to get follow-on venture capital.

For More Details - http://www.ghvaccelerator.com/
Source : The Hindu Business Line.